Bestselling author, Journalist, and now campaigner Helen Joyce joins John and Sarah to explain the contents of the Cass Review into the treatment of “transgender” children, and the wider implications of transgender ideology on western society.
Available on Spotify & iTunes
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/2EMk8yzyFELJRX6EkaPLhQ?si=cf6ed329c7b54a53
iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ie/podcast/trsi/id1502422176
Loading ...
Thank you for having Helen Joyce on John and Sarah, she’s a great if not the best advocate against this travesty. I’ve listened to Helen many times but yet I’m still saddened and shocked by the honest facts that she says. Please god let this all stop and the people affected by it given proper health care. Activists in this country need to be cut off financially they have no business going into schools and hospitals with their spin. Norma Foley knows the harm in the sphe books in schools and won’t remove them she says remove your child from the room if you don’t like it.
Excellent podcast! It is always refreshing to hear this factual information, not only because it is based on extensive research, investigation and data collection, but because it comes from a woman who presents it rationally and without fear.
Do not sacrifice truth on the altar of kindness – It serves no one.
The water gates to this and other issues were flung wide open when the HSE almost completely abdicated responsibility towards mental health with the closure of the vast majority of Ireland’s psychiatric facilities and the over-reliance on prescription medications.
The Helen Joyce podcast has been one of your best guest speakers so far!
John needs to get a new phone, I could barely make out what he was saying.
He needs to clear his throat before and during the shows… frog in throat perhaps 😄
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7440-gender-bending-chemicals-found-to-feminise-boys/.
Why is no one discussing this issue, the research has been published and highlights the why many more children are affected by toxins in our food water and cosmetics. All parents need to be aware of this problem.
Use the YUKA app to detect harmful chemicals in our food and cosmetics.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525581/
Some of the arguments are contradictory. On one hand, differences between sexes are real, but then towards the end, society is right to reject gender roles and boys should play with barbies? What is it?
It’s nonsense is what it is!! Three people agreeing with each other but next week the same podcast will give out about the ‘lack of debate’ in Irish public discourse. The two hosts have been gun shy about engaging with dissenting views ever since William Campbell spanked both of them hilariously on this podcast a year ago. They were advised to have another point of view engaging with their economist yesterday but ignored it.
We’re never going to agree 100% of the time and to the presenters credit, they are an exceptionally rare, endangered and valuable species: a media group that is prepared to take the risk of against the centre-left globalist consensus, at least some of the time. I haven’t seen the interview you refer to, so can’t comment on that. I would say that although this lady was very knowledgeable, articulate and clearly has the courage of her convictions, she also appears to me to be somebody who still operates withing the left-liberal framework of “equality” as the idol. That is leading her to hold contradictory positions on this topic.
👍
Boys can play with whatever they want and girls too. Just because a boy chooses to play with a doll doesn’t mean he’s a girl in a boys body that’s just stupid. If a girl plays football and prefers to wear trousers and a cap, she’s still a girl, that’s what they are saying. In the sphe books in schools they are teaching that liking the color blue makes u a boy no matter what sex u are or playing football if your a girl then u must be a boy. It’s disgraceful
The sexes are either different or they are not. The lie starts by pretending that its not a boy thing to play with action man, or a girl thing to play with barbie. Sure there can be overlapping cases on the borders, but the essence of the differences between men and women need to be acknowledged. By following the false idol of “equality”, movements like feminism sought to destroy these differences in their war against femininity and thus have played a role in creating the very thing that they are protesting now.
I couldn’t agree more
It really depends on whether you think in terms of nouns or verbs (being or doing). Not many people deny bodily reality. The issue for debate is whether body determines action. Richard Schechner’s work on Performance Theory is very good on this.
They are denying bodily reality – haven’t you been paying attention or are you just pretending you don’t know ?
Sex – bodily reality – exists.
Gender roles, tropes, conventions, culture and stereotypes arise from this but have no substantive existence in themselves.
They aren’t compulsory, fixed in stone, they overlap, etc. They certainly do not determine the former.
Gender ideologists – beginning with the paedophile Dr. John Money – invented ‘gender identity’, which has no substantive existence either.
They confuse their hypothetical ‘gender’ with sex so that they can say that sex is determined by the unsubstantive cultural things with an association typical to either sex.
Then they try to replace every circumstance and category that is built around the reality of the existence of the biological reality of the sexes with the invented ‘identities’.
And yes, they state that gender identity is the primary categorical determinant, and that sex is subject to it, is secondary, fluid or can be changed.
Confusing their own hypothetical fantasy for the reality.
And then they abuse, mutilate and sterilise children with pubertal anxieties in the cause of their ideology.
You’re not half as smart as you think you are, and your ‘being and doing’ cod-philosophy is just sheer wankery of sorts like yourself. Wordplay is just play, not intelligence or fact. Ditto ‘performance theory’. Up there with all the rest of the deconstructivist bollocks from academia – none of it tallies with reality outside their wanky thought-bubbles.
Well, at least you’ve shown your hand on the subject at last.
For the last several months all you’ve been doing here is making snide remarks at women who have spoken out against this stuff.
Like a weaselly little cunt, to be honest.
Yes I agree Paula, I played soccer and it didn’t mean I was a boy, Ive married A Man and had five children, my oldest son loved his sister’s doll and buggy they wrestle daily for this doll and buggy, today he’s is still boy/man with his own children.
Unfortunately today we have gender bender hormones in our food water and cosmetics.
The Economist is toilet paper or a WEF organ. Peddling BS climate scam lies for years.