The first thing to be said about yesterday’s ruling by the supreme court, which made defending oneself against charges of statutory rape a little bit easier, is that it is very hard to argue with the ruling on the grounds of the law.
Most criminal cases are straightforward: The state charges that an accused person did something, and the state must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, there is no obligation on an accused person to even present a defence: If the prosecution itself fails to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, then a defendant may well choose not to testify, or call any witnesses for the defence. The prosecution simply failing to prove that you did a thing is enough for the court to let you off the hook.
This article is premium content
Get unlimited access to Gript
Support Gript and get exclusive content, full archives and an ad-free experience