Ongoing conflict between Big Tech and the EU Commission.
Base politics.
I am hesitant, here, to accuse the Journal of consciously serving a nefarious agenda – but I am entirely comfortable in noting that a nefarious agenda exists which is served, even unconsciously, by this nonsense.
“A threat to everything we hold dear.”
Päivi Maria Räsänen
“I have made a decision”:
The ruling has been hailed as a ‘victory for free speech’.
As a general rule, a message that the authorities will go to great lengths to censor is always worth hearing, and understanding.
‘Political point scoring’
There’s a lot of positives to be said about Musk’s commitment to giving people a platform. But there’s an obvious case to be made that said platform should not extend to computer programs automatically shilling pornography to children, and others who don’t want to see it.
She can’t make herself out to be a defender of free speech when used the devil’s own Platform, social media, to shut down somebody whom she disapproved of, most especially because she did not understand what he was saying.
The bill is at once going to do nothing, so you don’t need to worry, and at the same time going to save us from the likes of Gavin Pepper.