WATCH: Green Cllr slammed after querying funding for statue of Jesus in Hardwicke Street Flats

A Green Party Councillor has denied she wanted to see a newly-replaced statue of Jesus in Hardwicke Street flats removed after controversy arose online regarding queries she raised on funding the statue at a Dublin City Council meeting.

The statue of Jesus in Hardwicke Street had been inadvertently broken by Dublin City Council twenty years ago during renovation, locals told Dublin Live. The replacement was provided by the Sisters of Charity, and the plinth was built by the Council to replace where the statue previously been placed.

Cllr Janet Horner asked the chamber whether the erection of the statue was paid for by Dublin City Council – saying she would have some concerns, and that spending public money on “these kinds of things” didn’t “seem quite ideal” to her.

“I guess, I’m just a bit curious about that,” she said. “Is that paid for by the Central Area Office; do we have a policy in relation to how we spend money for religious artefacts of different types, like which religions we provide artefacts for, if we have any rules governing that, or what the amount of money that is spent on religious items would be.”

“I would have some concerns about that, I would certainly have some concerns about how we recognise equity, recognition for different religions in the area – spending public money on those kinds of things doesn’t seem quite ideal to me,” she said.

The video of her comments led to a backlash online, with many commentators pointing out that the reinstallation of the statue had been requested by local people.

 

Robbie Kane of Dublin Live interviewed locals who spoke warmly about memories they had of the statue of Our Lord, and said it meant a lot to them to always have the statue a point to gather and pray.

“I’m glad to see it back,” one woman said, remembering how her family would gather and pray for those struggling with drug addiction. “It’s part of our religion,” another said, while the women agreed they had no problem with other religions being represented and said the area had no issues with integration.

“We’ve no problem with anybody doing what they wish to do, but Our Lord has to stay, He can’t be going,” one woman said. “It brings solace and comfort to people who live in these flats.”

They told Kane that they were “upset and angry” and “more than surprised” to hear that the reinstallation of the statue had been questioned and that there was any negativity towards the move.

“Upset and angry that her opinion was so negative,” one woman said. “And not respecting other people’s religion, as in the Roman Catholic religion.”

“Why did she not come down and speak to us about the statue?” another asked.

The original statue had been dedicated to the young people who died from drugs by Fr Jim Smith, local people said, at a time when drugs were ravaging the area.

 

In response to the controversy, Horner told Dublin Live: “There was no suggestion from me or anyone else in yesterday’s meeting that the statue should be removed. I am sorry to see that it is being said and causing upset to people who see the statue as very important to their community.

“However, I did want to clarify based on the information we received yesterday how the statue was financed as it wasn’t clear from the report whether the Council had paid for it or not. And overall, I don’t think it is appropriate for public money to be spent on religious statues, regardless of the religion in question.

“However, I clarified directly with the area manager after the meeting that the statue wasn’t financed by the Council – it was paid for by the local church – and that was the end of the issue from my side. I’m sorry to see the upset caused to people by some suggesting there was something further at play there.”

Share mdi-share-variant mdi-twitter mdi-facebook mdi-whatsapp mdi-telegram mdi-linkedin mdi-email mdi-printer mdi-chevron-left Prev Next mdi-chevron-right Related Comments Members can comment by signing in to their account. Non-members can register to comment for free here.
Subscribe
Notify of

33 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Mcguinness
18 days ago

The communists trying to eradicate religion again I see. What a surprise.

James McGuinness
17 days ago
Reply to  Pat Coyne

Thanks Pat, tbh, my views on the rcc are well known and this falls in line with indoctrination for me. If they actually taught the real bible as christians, I would be annoyed but because its the rcc and i believe them to be satanic, i dont have an issue with this. I do believe all students should be taught the real bible and what it means. On this story what they will change to is just satanic child sex grooming which needs to be removed asap.

Pat Coyne
17 days ago

The school will be as removed from a Christian ethos as possible if it becomes Dei instead of Deis.

Last edited 17 days ago by Pat Coyne
Wesley
16 days ago

You are very misinformed James.

Last edited 16 days ago by Wesley
Bill Buckley
18 days ago

There’s that word ‘equity’ again.

‘Progressive’ watermelon Greens are insistent on sinking the party.

Anne Donnellan
18 days ago
Reply to  Bill Buckley

Roll on 8 June. Please offer lift to polling station or iffer tobbabysit to ensure highest pissible turn out

Mary Reynolds
18 days ago

The residents know what to do, get the anti-Catholic bigot, Janet Horner out at the next election. The church were not obliged to replace the statue because the council inadvertently broke it and should have compensated the community long ago. Horner is a secularist whose targets are to eradicate the Catholic religion out of sight and sound, like all lefties. She has intruded on a peaceful and happy community and hurt them, who said, they want Our Lord. The statue has a rich meaning and has a history that means so much to them. They are delighted with its restoration. Long may it bring them prayerful consolation and happiness. The very sight of it endorses their religion. Like potatoes, our religion brings the Irish a special happiness, because it was a persecuted and banned religion and we fought for its survival. We won that fight. The Greens won’t take our victory from us.

Pat Coyne
18 days ago
Reply to  Mary Reynolds

Janet is a feminist and played a crucial role in the Dublin Central Together for Yes campaign to repeal the eighth amendment in 2018 she worked for Mark Malone at Comnlámh as a Quality Officer.

Sean Kennedy
18 days ago

I love how she frames this as if it’s some kind of principled thing and not just her dislike for Christianity. I’m sure she’d have the same complaint if it was a statue of Mohammed, right? My arse.

Mary Reynolds
18 days ago
Reply to  Sean Kennedy

Sean, there is no statue or image of Mohammed, it is prohibited in that religion. However, the anti-Catholic activists have targeted Catholic statues and icons and got them down, their lame excuse being we must make provision for emblems in other religions. Islam doesn’t have statues, some Protestants have a few that overlap with Catholics anyway. Judaism prohibits them. Only the non congregational religions such as Buddhists and Hindus have them. The secularists have us connected there. Sit on the floor and cross your legs and yoga will elevate you to whatever level you want. Bigots are doing their utmost with lies about inclusion of other religions, for whom statues are prohibited, to get rid of Christian statues and imagery, such as holy pictures, to wipe the Catholic religion out.

James Gough
18 days ago
Reply to  Mary Reynolds

They should prohibit all followers of the Pedophile prophet as well.

Pat Coyne
18 days ago
Reply to  Mary Reynolds

The degree of ignorance in the comment you are replying to demonstrates ignorance of the fundamentals of the Abrahamic faiths

David Sheridan
18 days ago

More anti-Catholic rhetoric from the communist Green Party. They are anti-life and anti- humanity. Their agenda is satanic.

Enda Curtin
18 days ago

Of course Miss Horner is sorry; there is an election fast approaching, after all!!

N23
17 days ago
Reply to  Enda Curtin

Sorry, but didn’t take responsibility for the “upset” caused. Apparently, that was because some people misinterpreted what she said and thought she suggested it be removed.

Fckin green trollop!

James Gough
18 days ago

Its easy to see what Counsellor Horner was doing. She was punching down at those less fortunate than her. Vile person..

GALLO
18 days ago

GREENS OUT GREENS OUT OUT OUT OUT

remembering Easter 1916
18 days ago

🐕woof woof 🇺🇦 👍 green party IRL 🛫🏢⛺🏥🛏️ all free😚

Last edited 18 days ago by remembering Easter 1916
BorisPastaBuck
18 days ago

Am I correct in stating Greta Thunberg was granted “Freedom of the City” – Dublin City, that is ? There must have been some administrative cost to Dublin City Council in doing so. Also – and maybe I misunderstand the consequence of the “Freedom” granted – but isn’t Ms Thunberg not obliged to pay certain municipal charges (should she happen to visit Dublin) ? Anyway, the religion of “Climate Change” – if I’m correct with my initial statement above – has been endowed by Dublin City Council – so why this is “Little Jill Horner” getting so worked up about the defrayment of a few bob on a statue of Jesus ???

Mary Reynolds
18 days ago
Reply to  BorisPastaBuck

The council did not pay for any statue. Horner made sure to create a stir, on the vague suspicion they may have paid, which was good grounds to discredit the religion. If she had good intentions, she’d have investigated it first. Fr. Jim Smith put up the first statue, but the council inadvertently broke it. The Sisters of Charity paid for its replacement and the council put back the plinth.

Dr David Barnwell
17 days ago

Remember
Horner did not receive one vote.
She was coopted.
I trust the good people of Central Dublin will decoopt her in a few weeks.
What a change from the Green Party of my youth, the radical party of Patricia McKenna, the party I supported.

Declan Cooney
18 days ago

C’MON MAN !!!! At least she did refer to the statue as “Our Lord”. And only Jesus is Lord (kyrios). So I guess, like the Apostle Thomas (“My Lord and my God”….first creedal statement) the good Cllr. is a conduit of the Holy Spirit. As me Granny (RIP) used to say, “God writes straight with CROOKED lines”.

Frank McGlynn
14 days ago

She doesn’t want public money spent on religious statues. That’s OK. But is she happy to see public money spent on promoting certain ideologies e.g. rainbow footpaths, Garda cars etc.

Des Crowe
14 days ago

🙏🙏🙏

Mitch
18 days ago

To be fair, the church have untold amounts of wealth from all their pilfering so why don’t they pay for it themselves. We don’t all still believe in fairytales.

Philip Kelly
18 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

You obviously do Mitch.

David Sheridan
18 days ago
Reply to  Philip Kelly

Touchè

Mary Reynolds
18 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

Read the article. Do you even give in to acknowledge who the Sisters of Charity are?Horner is a bigoted vigilante going about arousing suspicion and hostility towards the Catholic religion. Out with her at the next election. She has caused upset to this religious and peaceful community.

Fraj
18 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

You told us just this morning that abortion can be ” better for the child”, so clearly you believe in the fairytale of life-enhancing abortion!

Anne Donnellan
18 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

The Religious provided stellar serviveq in the delivery of education, health and social welfare. A small handful tarnished the reputation of the many gòd people. Compare the clean, well run hospitals under tge nuns to the current HSE situation

Dr David Barnwell
17 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

They didn’t break it, you need to hone your reading skills.

James Gough
15 days ago
Reply to  Mitch

Can you give an example of the “pilfering” you refer to Mitch ?

Should NGOs like NWCI be allowed to spend money they receive from the Government on political campaigns?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...