Photo credit: Unsplash

Irish teaching group calls to remove gender ideology from schools

“The promotion of gender identity poses significant risks to the welfare of children.”

That is according to a statement from the Irish Education Alliance (IEA), which describes itself as a “teacher organisation” aiming to “provide oversight” regarding Ireland’s education system.

In an open letter addressed to principals, teachers and school boards of management, the group hit out at proposed changes to Ireland’s SPHE curriculum, dubbing many elements of the plan “entirely inappropriate.”

“As professionals who work with children and adolescents, the health and wellbeing of our students is of paramount importance,” the group wrote.

“We have some serious concerns in relation to the proposed changes to the curriculum and
we would ask you to give this your full attention.”


The group criticised the presence of “gender identity” and “non-binary” gender within the draft curriculum, saying that “gender identity is an ideology – not a biological fact.”

“We are all born biologically male or female,” the letter reads.

“It is an opinion or a belief that our gender identity is separate to our biological sex. While this belief may be important to some people, it is not appropriate to teach it to young teenagers as a fact.”

The group said that “confusing terminology” was being “misrepresented to school children as fact.”


The group added that the promotion of such identities poses “significant risks to the welfare of children, who are being taught through this ideology that although biologically a male or female, they can choose to be different sex or must decide what gender to identify as.”

“Teenagers often suffer from anxiety, lack of self-esteem and may have difficulty accepting their changing bodies during puberty,” the letter continues.

“Adding extra confusion over their gender identity, is likely only to compound anxiety and confusion and in some cases cause serious psychological damage.”


The group highlighted what they believed was a discrepancy in the approach to such children.

“Children who would not be considered old enough to get a tattoo are being allowed to fundamentally change their bodies through taking hormones and undergoing surgery,” they wrote.

“The recent controversy over the Tavistock Clinic in the UK is just one example. While we recognise the importance of diversity, inclusion and respect for individual choices, it is not appropriate for an ideology such as gender identity to be taught to teenagers as fact, at the risk of causing them harm.”

Notably, 129 Irish children under the age of 16 have been sent by the HSE to the controversial Tavistock clinic in the UK to receive gender treatment. Some of these children are as young as 5.

129 Irish children under-16 referred to ‘unsafe’ Tavistock clinic


The group also called for the curriculum to “reduce the excessive focus on sexual activity,” and instead to emphasize “the importance and quality of relationships in the RSE programme.”

The group accused the plan of “promoting the pursuit of sexual pleasure for its own sake without a focus on the relationships involved,” which is a”the wrong emphasis to be giving school children.”


Lastly, the letter strongly objects to including information about pornography in the RSE curriculum, saying that such material “will lead to the further sexualisation of children.”

“In conclusion, several aspects of the draft SPHE/RSE curriculum, as outlined above, are
entirely inappropriate for children aged 12 to 15,” the group said.

“Under the Children First Act 2015, the interests of the child must always be paramount. We are calling on teachers, principals and boards of management, as the gatekeepers of their schools, to act now to protect the welfare of the vulnerable young people in their care as they are duty bound to do under the Children First Act.”

The group encouraged others to make a written submission to Ireland’s official curriculum body, the NCCA, via the link here. Submissions are open until Tuesday the 18th of October.

Notably, Gript has done a series of investigations into some of the controversial material currently being promoted in Irish schools, which you can read below.


Share mdi-share-variant mdi-twitter mdi-facebook mdi-whatsapp mdi-telegram mdi-linkedin mdi-email mdi-printer mdi-chevron-left Prev Next mdi-chevron-right Related
Comments are open

Should Fr Sheehy apologise to Simon Coveney?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...