Credit: RawPixel

Scottish police “cannot cope” with deluge of hate crime reports; over 7,000 reports in first week

Police in Scotland are struggling to cope with a deluge of “politicised” hate crime reports, just a week after new hate crime legislation went into effect.

Police Scotland are said to be overwhelmed with reports of hate crimes, while investigating every claim risks “overwhelming” officers, with roughly 8,000 reports received in the first week of the legislation.

In an update posted on Wednesday, Police Scotland confirmed data showed there have been 7,152 online hate reports received between 1 April and 7 April.

During this period 240 hate crimes and 30 non-crime hate incidents recorded, the force said.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act (2021) introduces new offences for threatening or abusive behaviour intended to stir up hatred based on protected characteristics including age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity and variations in sex characteristics. The provisions add to the country’s existing offence of “stirring up racial hatred,” which has been in place across the UK since 1986.

Last year, ahead of the law’s enforcement, Police Scotland had revealed a public awareness advertising campaign, featuring the ‘Hate Monster,’ which warned about the dangers of hate crime in Scotland. The controversial campaign recently resurfaced following the introduction of the law.

The act necessitates the chief constable of Police Scotland to produce an annual report laying out the details of each recorded offence, including the sex, age, ethic or national origin of any individual re order as a victim.

The new laws were developed following Lord Bracadale’s Independent Review of Hate Crime Legislation, which reached the conclusion that new specific offences relating to stirring up hatred were “needed.” The legislation was passed by a majority of MSPs in the Scottish Parliament in 2021, but only took effect on 1 April.

The controversial law has drawn criticism from one of Scotland’s most senior legal figures, who has called for the SNP hate crime law to be withdrawn. Lord Hope of Craighead has said that the title and wording of the contentious law has been “misunderstood” by the public, telling The Times newspaper that the legislation is “unworkable,” while accusing the politicians who supported it of indulging in what he called “gesture politics.”

Lord Hope, 85, who served as the most senior judge in Scotland as lord justice general, and later as deputy president of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, said that “Hate crime” was “a most unfortunate name” for the bill, adding that “it raises all sorts of thoughts in people’s minds, without any idea of what the bill is actually saying.”

Hope said that the Bill has “misfired” as it uses a “very provocative title” that makes people think “there’s more in it than there really is.”

He said that by suggesting all forms of hatred had been criminalised, the law had encouraged a flood of complaints which cannot actually be dealt with under the act. Lord Hope also said that section 15 of the act, which sets out the type of evidence police must investigate after a complaint is made, placed an “extraordinary burden” on officers.

“I think it’s unworkable if the police are going to have to administer this, because they have the burden of sifting and recording a myriad of complaints by people who are not really aware of the details of the legislation.”

“It’s an extraordinary position.” the senior figure added, saying: “I’ve not seen anything like this before, and it’s no wonder the police are being deluged in trying to carry it out.”

Scotland’s first minister Humza Yousaf has been a strong backer of the bill amidst heavy widespread criticism, saying that opponents of the act are guilty of spreading misinformation. Speaking on BBC News this week, Yousaf responded to criticism of the legislation, as he hit out at “the far-right.”

However, David Threadgold, chairman of the Scottish Police Federation, has added his voice to those critical of the legislation, warning that people are using the law for “political point scoring.”

Threadgold said that the scale of calls to police since the act became law was “simply unmanageable.”

Speaking on BBC Radio 4 in recent days, Threadgold said: “Police Scotland have gone public and said that on every occasion, reports of hate crimes will be investigated. That creates a situation where we simply cannot cope with demand at the moment.”

“We’ve not given them the opportunities to ask the ‘what if’ questions during the training that has been provided by Police Scotland to interpret this legislation to the satisfaction of the public,” he said.

He added: “Vexatious complaints, people who look to weaponise this legislation or who make these complaints for personal gain or political point scoring … creates a problem for the police which can affect public satisfaction in my organisation.”

Share mdi-share-variant mdi-twitter mdi-facebook mdi-whatsapp mdi-telegram mdi-linkedin mdi-email mdi-printer mdi-chevron-left Prev Next mdi-chevron-right Related Comments Members can comment by signing in to their account. Non-members can register to comment for free here.
Subscribe
Notify of

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Mcguinness
19 days ago

If they pass the hate laws here, Im going to look for every ounce of hate from ngos and politicians including the white privilege dail speeches and report them.

LotusEater
18 days ago

I have a file of Hazel Chu’s remarks ready to go 😂

Peter Murray
19 days ago

I am proud to have predicted exactly this mess when I commented on the Irish counterpart of this legislation several months ago.
It is a charter for vindictive cranks and an invitation for vexatious wastage of already overstretched police resources.

Buddha
18 days ago
Reply to  Peter Murray

Maybe so, but some of the claims were civic-minded saboteurs doing a public service – in showing the absurdity of the legislation.
Their ‘vexatious’ claims are political mirror-images of the ones the legislation was designed to favour in some cases, statements of biological fact and the sexual predilictions of the protected male ‘trans’ category in others
Any temporary chaos caused will be worth its derailment.
And might make those in our own neck of the woods think twice.

Last edited 18 days ago by Buddha
Buddha
19 days ago

I’m proud to say that one of those is mine.

James Gough
18 days ago

The police can go and F*** themselves. They were all on board with this. They even made training videos showing that a well known children’s author might be committing hate crimes. Now the reality of what they supported is beginning to hit home. They are a laughing stock and they richly deserve to be.

Casso Wary
18 days ago

Haha haha haha. Keep it going, pour it on.

A Call for Honesty
18 days ago

As I keep commenting, there is no way to prove a hate crime unless you can read the mind of the accused and determine his motives. Only if hatred results in a crime like assault or arson or murder or slander or the likes which can be proven and punished. However in these cases the punishment is not for hatred but for the assault, arson, murder or slander for which there are already laws. Can our Minister of Justice prove I am wrong? She cannot because no one can read minds. Further a hate crime law can be used to criminalize justified hatred for what is evil and for calling it out because it exposes evil deeds.

Last edited 18 days ago by A Call for Honesty
Peter Kelliher
18 days ago

As I keep saying we need to re-name these laws as anti Free Speech laws. Don’t play the game on their terms.

Joseph Doyle
18 days ago

It’s an own goal

Should NGOs like NWCI be allowed to spend money they receive from the Government on political campaigns?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...